Reviewer: Russ Housley Review result: Almost Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>. Document: draft-ietf-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit-14 Reviewer: Russ Housley Review Date: 2024-12-02 IETF LC End Date: 2024-12-09 IESG Telechat date: Unknown Summary: Almost Ready Major Concerns: None Minor Concerns: Section 7: The text says: ... These protocols have to use a secure transport layer (e.g., SSH [RFC4252], TLS [RFC8446], and QUIC [RFC9000]) and have to use mutual authentication. I assume that NETCONF and RESTCONF REQUIRE a secure transport and mutual authentication. Is that correct? If so, can this be written in a way that makes it clear that these other protocols already impose these requirements? Nits: IDnits points out some outdated references: == Outdated reference: A later version (-18) exists of draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit-17 == Outdated reference: A later version (-13) exists of draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-common-ac-12 == Outdated reference: A later version (-21) exists of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis-20 == Outdated reference: A later version (-11) exists of draft-ietf-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue-10 IDnits also complains about a non-ASCII character. This is not a concern because it appears in a name (Björklund). -- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
