On December 4, 2024 7:18:23 PM UTC, "John R. Levine" <johnl@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >Thanks for the review. > >On Wed, 4 Dec 2024, Ines Robles via Datatracker wrote: ... >> 6-Appendix C.3: Related to "...That RFC was an Experimental RFC, and the >> results of that experiment were that the RFC was not implemented as written..." >> It would be nice to add some references to the results of that experiment. > >I don't think there are any. They were observations by the author of the RFC. > We could also say something like the tree walk design in DMARCbis overcame the need for a PSD DMARC registry, which was the issue that led to it being experimental. Scott K -- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
