Hi,
Thank you for addressing my comments.
I’m fine with what Scott proposed.
Regards,
Ines
On Thu, Dec 5, 2024 at 3:39 AM Scott Kitterman <scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On December 4, 2024 7:18:23 PM UTC, "John R. Levine" <johnl@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Thanks for the review.
>
>On Wed, 4 Dec 2024, Ines Robles via Datatracker wrote:
...
>> 6-Appendix C.3: Related to "...That RFC was an Experimental RFC, and the
>> results of that experiment were that the RFC was not implemented as written..."
>> It would be nice to add some references to the results of that experiment.
>
>I don't think there are any. They were observations by the author of the RFC.
>
We could also say something like the tree walk design in DMARCbis overcame the need for a PSD DMARC registry, which was the issue that led to it being experimental.
Scott K
--
last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
-- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
