Re: [121attendees] Re: [Alldispatch] Results of the ALLDISPATCH Experiment (Was: Results and report of the IETF 121 post-meeting survey)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



 

On Thu, 28 Nov 2024, 10:41 Salz, Rich, <rsalz=40akamai.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 11/27/24, 7:32 PM, I wrote:
>I don't understand why you think it is important that everyone in the IETF cares about its organization.

> As a datapoint that argues against that proposition, note that with one exception barely 1/4 of the population volunteers for NomCom

And as another datapoint, ALLDISPATCH at 121, which had nothing scheduled against it, had 300 attendees (again about 1/4 of the population), and 2026 and 2418 were announced on the agenda weeks ahead of time.

  • 300 is pretty good isn't it? That's a significant cross section.

I don’t know what Brian’s goal is.  The plenary had 300 attendance as well. And I have no idea how to get even 300 people to have a conversation in-person.


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux