Rob Wilton \(rwilton\) <rwilton=40cisco.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> One proviso is that the charter for GENAREA needs to be very clear
> about what small things it can take on, and what things really need
> wider community consensus first. And I don’t really mean on the size
> of the work, but the potential impact of the work on the community or
> the standards process.
It seems you are just re-creating GENDISPATCH with a new name.
If you want to take on "small" things, then just say something like:
"GENDISPATCH can also do small efforts, as determined by the IESG"
we don't need to anticipate everything, or litigate everything twice in
charter than then again.
====
I prefer to keep GENDISPATCH with the other dispatch work.
I think it's MORE IMPORTANT than the other dispatch work that it be
conflict-free.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
