Re: [121attendees] Re: [Alldispatch] Results of the ALLDISPATCH Experiment (Was: Results and report of the IETF 121 post-meeting survey)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I would be okay replacing most of the plenary along these lines.  And I really like the idea of moving the ANRP prize talks into the evening as a plenary activity.  There are four aspects I would not want to see lost:

  1. The IETF chair, and as necessary, other leaders such as the IED or NOMCOM chair, may have urgent or important business that needs raising with the community;
  2. We should honor those who have served the community.  We need to do more of this.
  3. We should honor our host;
  4. The community needs a window to provide feedback and to put faces to names of people who hold leadership roles.  This is especially important when one considers that people have flown thousands of kms/miles to attend these functions.

But I think all of the above can continue and we could still save a lot of time.  Just call "ALLDISPATCH" the plenary ;-)

Eliot


On 26.11.2024 23:45, George Michaelson wrote:
replace the IETF plenary with this, and you'd have zero impact on the agenda time.

Not that I dislike the people who speak in plenary, but if the formalism is "these are statutory reports which need to be made to the community" we can do that in a brown bag lunch.

I stress, I bear no animosity to any of the people obligated to make statutory reports. And I think statutory reports should be made. 

-G
_______________________________________________
121attendees mailing list -- 121attendees@xxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to 121attendees-leave@xxxxxxxx

Attachment: OpenPGP_0x87B66B46D9D27A33.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux