Re: [Alldispatch] Re: [121attendees] Results of the ALLDISPATCH Experiment (Was: Results and report of the IETF 121 post-meeting survey)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 27, 2024, at 15:32, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> GENDISPATCH never had a conflict-free slot before, and it was fine. I'd 
> actually suggest moving away from the DISPATCH model for 
> process/administrative things, and just have a standing GENAREA WG that 
> can take on small things and request the AD to create WGs for bigger 
> things.

This seems like the right answer to me as well.  It's not like we need to decide where process/admin work needs to go.

Or at least, the problem is limited in scope: occasionally, this will stray outside of our process or into RFC series process, but we know how to deal with those.




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux