On 03-Nov-24 01:02, Pete Resnick wrote:
On 30 Oct 2024, at 4:30, Martin Thomson wrote:
...bury a statement like that in an applicability statement.
Why is putting something in the A/S (which is a standards track
document) "burying" it?
[Consider that the current Internet Standard is RFC 821. RFC 5321 is a
Draft Standard. (Yes, it's that old.) So the "official" recommendation
of the IETF is that 821 is preferred over 5321. Does it really matter in
which document a particular security discussion appears?]
OT: A perfect example of why we should have progressed draft-loughney-newtrk-one-size-fits-all many years ago.
Brian
--
last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
