[Last-Call] Re: [Emailcore] Re: Re: SECDIR Review of draft-ietf-emailcore-rfc5321bis-31

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



It appears that Ted Lemon  <mellon@xxxxxxxxx> said:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>Right, this is my exact point: there is no reason for us not to do this.

I remain impressed that people are eager to casually mandate incompatible
breaking changes in a forty year old protocol that is used all over the world.

While I entirely agree that people should use STARTTLS when sending mail over
the public Internet, and the A/S says so, I do not know all of the nooks and
crannies where people use SMTP, neither do you, and neither does anyone else. 

I can easily imagine scenarios where STARTTLS makes no sense, and I see no
reason to gratuitously declare their existing working systems are no longer
standard compliant. It just makes us look arrogant and out of touch.

Leave STARTTLS in the A/S where it belongs and let us finish this thing.

R's,
John

-- 
last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux