Russ, Thank you for the explanation. Linda -----Original Message----- From: Russ Housley <housley@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Saturday, August 10, 2024 12:15 PM To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: IETF Gen-ART <gen-art@xxxxxxxx>; draft-ietf-lamps-rfc8708bis.all@xxxxxxxx; Last Call <last-call@xxxxxxxx>; Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME Discussion List <spasm@xxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-rfc8708bis-01 > Nits/editorial comments: > > Section 1.4 describes the change regarding the KEY field in the > pk-HSS-LMS-HashSig definition to reflect "no ASN.1 wrapping for the > public key". I am not an expert in this domain, but would like to know > what are the reasons behind removing the ASN.1 wrapping? Does RFC8708 imply ASN.1 wrapping? Linda: Experience from the hackathon shows it is better without the wrapping. Russ -- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
