[Last-Call] Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-rfc8708bis-01

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Nits/editorial comments:
> 
> Section 1.4 describes the change regarding the KEY field in the
> pk-HSS-LMS-HashSig definition to reflect "no ASN.1 wrapping for the public
> key". I am not an expert in this domain, but would like to know what are the
> reasons behind removing the ASN.1 wrapping? Does RFC8708 imply ASN.1 wrapping?

Linda:

Experience from the hackathon shows it is better without the wrapping.

Russ
-- 
last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux