Re: RFPs and IPv6

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: ietf@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: RFPs and IPv6
From: Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 22:04:17 -0400
Feedback-id: i5d8c41f0:Fastmail
In-reply-to: <82D6A2CA2B98B661680E2642@PSB>
References: <ba019238-3e41-4bbe-93b6-81ffbb009f42@gmail.com> <CAN-Dau2BiWQ76dO099UkzLvAU+vfjR8bbgVPh9mXEzUmHurOWQ@mail.gmail.com> <29E46CFD-E996-4511-8107-5E5119B3D5B4@comcast.com> <20240701201732.GY29907@miplet.aaaaa.org> <20240701203408.BEBA48E8D9D5@ary.qy> <82D6A2CA2B98B661680E2642@PSB>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

On 7/1/24 18:24, John C Klensin wrote:

RFPs should require IPv4 support and ask for IPv6 support.

I emphatically disagree. Both IPv4 and IPv6 support must be mandatory.

Keith

References:
- RFPs and IPv6
  - From: Brian E Carpenter
- Re: RFPs and IPv6
  - From: David Farmer
- Re: RFPs and IPv6
  - From: Livingood, Jason
- Re: RFPs and IPv6
  - From: Ofer Inbar
- Re: RFPs and IPv6
  - From: John Levine
- Re: RFPs and IPv6
  - From: John C Klensin

Prev by Date: Re: RFPs and IPv6
Next by Date: Re: RFPs and IPv6
Previous by thread: Re: RFPs and IPv6
Next by thread: Re: RFPs and IPv6
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Mhonarc] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux