Hi Stephen, Michael,
At 05:18 PM 28-06-2024, Stephen Farrell wrote:
I do not see why the IETF needs to make use of a "major" email-delivery
service at all. Surely there are some mid-tier or similar equivalents.
More generally, dropping IPv6 without first asking the community is a
bad smell. (Apologies if I missed where the community were asked.)
There is the following clause in a RFP which was issued in 2011:
"Vendor shall provide world-class IP support ? IPv4 and IPv6. All IT
services should be accessible from IPv4 and IPv6, with no difference
in performance, quality, delay, and support."
The contract, which also covered mailing lists
services, was awarded to Association Management
Solutions. The contract was renewed over the
years. I don't remember seeing any SLA issue
listed in the reports which were sent to this
mailing list. Were there any report of a SLA issue during the plenary?
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
