On Wed, Jun 12, 2024, at 11:03, Adam Roach wrote: > In this case, I think the following promise makes a blanket ban not just advisable, but entirely necessary: > > On 6/9/24 23:05, Timothy Mcsweeney wrote: >> And Roman, if I were you, I would expand this ban to all of the lists because you can be sure that I won''t be participating in good faith on any other list after a ban. This is very compelling. Adam's argument that - while the action would not be covered by a BCP - we can agree to exceptional actions in exceptional circumstances is equally compelling. We managed that successfully for last year's NomCom. We can do so again. I support the implementation of a blanket ban in this specific case. Our procedural requirements should be satisfied by another last call. I request that the IESG start that call. This thread might be evidence that we won't reach unanimity, but it seems like we might reach (rough) consensus. -- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
