Well, if you think hitting on happily married mothers isn't inherently misogynistic, you must be fun at parties. Lloyd Wood lloyd.wood@xxxxxxxxxxx > On 12 Jun 2024, at 04:53, John C Klensin <john-ietf@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Similarly, I can find nothing in the problematic posting that is > inherently misogynistic. It it were, than a statement by an IETF > participant (or any gender) that they found another IETF participant > (or any gender) attractive would constitute hating personals of the > latter gender, whether they expressed a desire to follow up on the > attraction or not. Again, unprofessional and obnoxious if posted to > a public list and probably harassment if the comment and "invitation" > where made repeatedly without any sign of interest (or indications of > disinterest) from the target party, but "misogynistic" is quite a > stretch. -- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
