[Last-Call] Re: L2 posting rights restriction

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I'm a bit confused: I thought that we also had a 6-month ban. Am I remembering this wrong? IIRC there was one applied to a certain expert on distributed naming databases years back.

On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 12:42 PM Chris Box <chris.box.ietf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 10 Jun 2024 at 17:12, Michael Douglass <mikeadouglass@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

The response to that offensive posting has left me near speechless. If that didn't warrant an immediate and permanent ban what does?

This just reinforces the view that the IETF does not take this kind of behavior seriously.

Michael if I understand you correctly, your position is that the standard operating procedures should not max out at a 14-day posting restriction, as they currently do.

To be clear, are you asking for a Level 3 (or perhaps 4) which implements a posting restriction of indefinite duration?

Chris

--
last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
-- 
last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux