Thanks for all of the work on this, it looks reasonable to me. One nit: 2.1 says '“Antitrust” is the word that is used in the US and in several other jurisdictions' 'several' is pushing it; this is pretty much just the US and sometimes Canada, AIUI. Cheers, > On 18 May 2024, at 6:16 AM, The IESG <iesg-secretary@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider the > following document: - 'Antitrust Guidelines for IETF Participants' > <draft-halpern-gendispatch-antitrust-08.txt> as Informational RFC > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final > comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > last-call@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2024-06-14. Exceptionally, comments may > be sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the beginning > of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. > > Abstract > > > This document provides education and guidance for IETF participants > on compliance with antitrust laws and how to reduce antitrust risks > in connection with IETF activities. > > > > > The file can be obtained via > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-halpern-gendispatch-antitrust/ > > > > No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > IETF-Announce mailing list -- ietf-announce@xxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to ietf-announce-leave@xxxxxxxx -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ -- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
