On 18-May-24 14:01, Mark Nottingham wrote:
Thanks for all of the work on this, it looks reasonable to me.
One nit: 2.1 says '“Antitrust” is the word that is used in the US and in several other jurisdictions'
'several' is pushing it; this is pretty much just the US and sometimes Canada, AIUI.
I strongly support this draft and I hope it will soon be published (and mentioned in the Note Well).
Seeing Mark's comment, I wonder whether the document title should be extended to
"Antitrust and Competition Law Guidelines for IETF Participants"
Regards
Brian
Cheers,
On 18 May 2024, at 6:16 AM, The IESG <iesg-secretary@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider the
following document: - 'Antitrust Guidelines for IETF Participants'
<draft-halpern-gendispatch-antitrust-08.txt> as Informational RFC
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
last-call@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2024-06-14. Exceptionally, comments may
be sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the beginning
of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
Abstract
This document provides education and guidance for IETF participants
on compliance with antitrust laws and how to reduce antitrust risks
in connection with IETF activities.
The file can be obtained via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-halpern-gendispatch-antitrust/
No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
_______________________________________________
IETF-Announce mailing list -- ietf-announce@xxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ietf-announce-leave@xxxxxxxx
--
Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
--
last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
