Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-multi-sa-performance-06

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 12:13:19PM +0000, Marcus Ihlar wrote:
> I think it would be sufficient to include a paragraph that mentions that this solution can introduce packet reordering and variable delays and that packet scheduling/load-balancing implementations should take this into consideration. Without going into details on how to solve it.

I'm not sure if I get your point. Can you elaborate on why this
can introduce packet reordering and variable delays.

Thanks,

Steffen

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux