On 8. Apr 2024, at 06:06, Bron Gondwana <brong=40fastmailteam.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I suggest saying something like this in the security considerations: > > […] SHOULD […] The security considerations section is not the place to make normative statements about the protocol. What *is* the security consideration that would lead to such a set of statement? (I also think that this would be a rather heavy late change of the protocol. Has the "Freeform Class as defined in PRECIS” been examined to actually be useful for this application? [Quick, does it say all the right things about bidirectional strings for contact information?] Why is the server only to be restricted about setting “names" while the client is restricted about displaying any strings?) Grüße, Carsten -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
