Hi Peter, > On 23. Mar 2024, at 10:47, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > It's also true that we have not done as good a job of that due diligence as we could have (discouraged in part by the IAB statement [1] issued in 2015), but RFC 9233 remedied that oversight for IDNA and we're working on a similar Internet-Draft for PRECIS. Thank you for updating me on the PRECIS efforts. Given that we are discussing this in the context of draft-ietf-jmap-contacts: Do you believe we should force this and similar specs to normatively reference PRECIS and use this to create more detailed definitions of the text-based data items? Grüße, Carsten -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
