Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting deadlines for the IESG and the community

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



As the wg chair of a WG which has never met at an IETF, and thus the two week
freeze serves no purpose for this *WG*, I am in favour of the two week
freeze.  Why? Because many of us participate in more than one WG.
Given that the queue now (since a few years) opens on Saturday morning rather
than Monday morning, it provides a useful and reasonable deadline which
authors can work with.  (I'm agnostic about an earlier deadline for -00)

In one or two cases, the freeze has been annoying to a document
which was at the IESG, but the AD override worked fine for that, and the AD
was in fact completely in the loop.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-                      *I*LIKE*TRAINS*



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux