On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 3:36 PM Martin Thomson <mt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, Jan 26, 2024, at 05:49, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> I fully support the draft. The Tao has outlived its usefulness as an RFC.
Same, though I might say something bolder: The Tao has outlived its usefulness.
(Frankly, I thought that this move had already happened. Also, though I realize that the publishing of a document like this needs consensus, I don't believe that there needs to be IETF consensus to publish a web page. This is generally a good thing as long as those who do the publishing are not completely immune to sanction if they publish something that reflects badly on the rest of us.)
I agree with Martin. This change is long overdue.
-Ekr
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
