I fully support the draft. The Tao has outlived its usefulness as an RFC. On 26-Jan-24 05:54, Deen, Glenn wrote: ...
I’m surprised something as core to the IETF as the TAO is going direct to last call so quickly and hasn’t had broader discussion/review.
I don't understand that comment. This discussion has been going on for at least 18 months, and specifically since this message on the public list devoted to the Tao: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tao-discuss/DedMWVvKwm7TA3zM7Fvy45DoW78 and I think the draft itself explains and justifies the change. Regards Brian Carpenter -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
