On Jan 25, 2024, at 13:50, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I fully support the draft. The Tao has outlived its usefulness as an RFC I agree. As for those believing a single long document is the best way to consume content these days, I advise you to try out TikTok to get a better idea of modern content consumption methods. I love the historic and nostalgic bits but those should have its own place outside of a “quick 101 IETF how to”. The tao is huge. Paul > On 26-Jan-24 05:54, Deen, Glenn wrote: > ... > >> I’m surprised something as core to the IETF as the TAO is going direct to last call so quickly and hasn’t had broader discussion/review. > > I don't understand that comment. This discussion has been going on for at least 18 months, and specifically since this message on the public list devoted to the Tao: > > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tao-discuss/DedMWVvKwm7TA3zM7Fvy45DoW78 > > and I think the draft itself explains and justifies the change. > > Regards > Brian Carpenter > -- > last-call mailing list > last-call@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
