Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> thank you for sharing your thoughts. And I fully agree with you,
> "Non-expiring" must not be used for individual drafts. Where I see that
> such a state could be useful is in cases when there's a choice between
> publishing a document (in my experience, these were always
> Informational
The WG chair button lets the WG chair mark any individual draft as Related.
I see no reason why the WG chair couldn't also sort it into the
(Non-Expiring) Reference Material.
{Some "personal" I-Ds are often very relevant to WGs. One could argue they
should be just adopted, since WG chairs can also do that by fiat. So maybe I
agree with you that individual drafts shouldn't be marked, because WG chairs
should just adopt them}
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
