Re: Question about use of RSVP in Production Networks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dean Anderson wrote:
RSVP is a idea that doesn't cut the mustard in the real world. There are
several show-stopper problems with RSVP.

1) somewhat like multicast, anyone using RSVP is vulnerable to others
mis-using or mis-configuring RSVP. ISPs several AS's away can really screw
up things for other ISPs. Because of this, it is unwise to deploy it
because it requires too much trust in other ISPs.

That isn't a fault of RSVP, the protocol. Rather, it's a fault of insufficient authorization for a requested flow.

That relegates RSVP to the enterprise Lan, where it usually isn't needed.
Remember, RSVP is only useful if you have a congestion problem and need to
choose which packets to discard.  If you have no congestion problem, then
you have no need of RSVP.

Enterprises have WANs (ATM, FR, MPLS) which do have congestion problems. Even within a LAN it's possible to have congestion problems (PC backups, database replication).

> However, having a congestion problem also opens
the question of the nature of the congestion and what is the best way to
deal that problem.  I was involved in a study done by Genuity and Cisco in
which the congestion problem was found to most often involve the tail
circuit--the link between the customer and the ISP.  The best solution for
this problem was found to be low latency queuing, not RSVP.

2) Unlike multicast, every hop end-to-end must use RSVP for it to be
useful.

RSVP only needs to be enabled on the links that might become congested, such as an enterprise's WAN links. It usually doesn't need to be enabled on a non-bandwidth-constrained LAN.

-d

> An RSVP tunnel is useless.
>
3) RSVP doesn't detect certain kinds of problems that are important. For
example, a mid-span failure is not visible to RSVP.

While RSVP is important research, it is not a widely deployable
technology.

What I-D's are you encountering that depend on RSVP?

		--Dean

On Tue, 10 Aug 2004, Fleischman, Eric wrote:


I am aware of some use of RSVP in labs but I am not aware of any use of
RSVP in production networks (i.e., real life networks people connect to
the Internet with). Simultaneously, I am encountering I-Ds and other
work planning to use RSVP. This possible disconnect concerns me.
Therefore, I would appreciate being educated by anybody using RSVP in
production settings. Would you please let me know how many devices, what
applications, and how successful these deployments (if any) are? Thank
you.


_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]