> I don't know whether stopping "manyfolks" is right or not. Sigh. Are there Internet Drafts that matter, that *don't* have inputs from "many folks"? and if so, why? I could never decide whether this was more likely a pure-hearted attempt at modesty or an evil-hearted attempt to demonstrate that "many folks back this draft, so can we have a Proposed Standard now?" I remember noticing manyfolks drafts during about the same timeframe as Internet Drafts with so many "authors" they couldn't all be listed on the front page, so I leaned more toward the latter theory. Fortunately, this isn't included in the part of the universe I'm in charge of, these days. Spencer _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf