Re: Naming convention for a WG I-D that returns to

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



hm.... do you think Olaf Kolkman has misspelled his name, or what?

and draft-ietf-sip-manyfolks is *formally* correct.

draft-ymbk has tradition, but it's likely to be crushed under the wheel of procedural correctness once the present batch is gone.

I don't know whether stopping "manyfolks" is right or not.

                harald

--On 30. juli 2004 09:34 -0700 Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Bill,

At 03:46 AM 7/30/2004, Bill Manning wrote:

clearly different rules apply, depending on whom makes the submission.

for example, several individual submissions were made before this
IETF and we (the authors) were told that we -MUST- use the name of
one of th eauthors in the draft name... however, we see that other
individual submissions are allowed to fabricate ID lables that do not
reflect any of the authors or any WG.  e.g.

draft-ymbk-downref-03.txt
draft-kolkman-dnsext-dnssec-in-band-rollover-00

There are also some drafts by someone called "manyfolks":

   draft-manyfolks-sipping-ToIP-01.txt
   draft-manyfolks-nsis-nslp-QSpec-00.txt
   draft-ietf-sip-manyfolks-resource-07.txt

Bob








_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]