Re: Naming convention for a WG I-D that returns to

"JFC (Jefsey) Morfin" <jefsey@xxxxxxxxxx> · Sat, 31 Jul 2004 11:19:23 +0200

What about an information draft reporting on the results of the work of an 
existing organization or project? Can it use the name of the organization 
and only quote as authors the actual writers? where/holw should the 
organization be introduced? Is there any difference if the draft is not for 
information?

thank you. jfc

PS. Can someone tell me which RFC says that a draft must include a security 
part?. thank you;

At 04:59 31/07/2004, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
hm.... do you think Olaf Kolkman has misspelled his name, or what?

and draft-ietf-sip-manyfolks is *formally* correct.

draft-ymbk has tradition, but it's likely to be crushed under the wheel of 
procedural correctness once the present batch is gone.

I don't know whether stopping "manyfolks" is right or not.

                harald

--On 30. juli 2004 09:34 -0700 Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Bill,

At 03:46 AM 7/30/2004, Bill Manning wrote:

clearly different rules apply, depending on whom makes the submission.

for example, several individual submissions were made before this
IETF and we (the authors) were told that we -MUST- use the name of
one of th eauthors in the draft name... however, we see that other
individual submissions are allowed to fabricate ID lables that do not
reflect any of the authors or any WG.  e.g.

draft-ymbk-downref-03.txt
draft-kolkman-dnsext-dnssec-in-band-rollover-00

There are also some drafts by someone called "manyfolks":

   draft-manyfolks-sipping-ToIP-01.txt
   draft-manyfolks-nsis-nslp-QSpec-00.txt
   draft-ietf-sip-manyfolks-resource-07.txt

Bob

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf