Re: Naming convention for a WG I-D that returns to

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "JFC (Jefsey) Morfin" <jefsey@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Naming convention for a WG I-D that returns to
From: Sal Mangiapane <salm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2004 07:03:48 -0400
Cc: ietf@xxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <6.1.2.0.2.20040731110208.029b7730@mail.jefsey.com>
Organization: Servant Technology, Inc.
Reply-to: salm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (Windows/20040626)

PS. Can someone tell me which RFC says that a draft must include a security part?. thank you;


RFC2223 section 9

Sal

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Naming convention for a WG I-D that returns to
  - From: JFC (Jefsey) Morfin

References:
- Re: Naming convention for a WG I-D that returns to individual submission?
  - From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: Naming convention for a WG I-D that returns to
  - From: Bob Hinden
- Re: Naming convention for a WG I-D that returns to
  - From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: Naming convention for a WG I-D that returns to
  - From: JFC (Jefsey) Morfin

Prev by Date: Re: Naming convention for a WG I-D that returns to
Next by Date: Re: Naming convention for a WG I-D that returns to
Previous by thread: Re: Naming convention for a WG I-D that returns to
Next by thread: Re: Naming convention for a WG I-D that returns to
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]