I guess i am a sucker for questionaires, and hence a nightmare for Jay (sorry),
but i think it could be quite enlightening to ask IETF participants
if they consider going in person to IETF more a perk or a chore.
Ideally, that answer should be independent of sustainability concerns.
As important as it is, it can bias judging a lot of our lifestyle.
(can still ask separately for sustainability concerns).
Cheers
Toerless
On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 01:16:21PM -0700, Marc Petit-Huguenin wrote:
> Minneapolis is a work destination, not a leisure destination, which makes it unsuitable for people who mistake the IETF for a travel agency.
>
> But +1.
>
> On 7/31/23 13:01, Andrew G. Malis wrote:
> > Another vote for Minneapolis! The hotel couldn't have been better suited
> > for us, and you can walk indoors to most of downtown to avoid bad weather.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Andy
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 3:41 PM Mary B <mary.h.barnes@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> Minneapolis was a great venue for us. It's never been clear to me why we
> >> stopped going there regularly.
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 1:43 PM Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 7/31/23 14:16, Randy Presuhn wrote:
> >>>
> >>> The unavailability of good public transportation would on its own be a
> >>> reason to rule out any meeting venue, on cost, practical and environmental
> >>> factors.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> You're really making the case for meeting in Minneapolis. :-)
> >>>
> >>> Minneapolis was the best overall venue we ever had. Or at least, the
> >>> best venue in the US.
> >>>
> >>> Keith
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >
>
> --
> Marc Petit-Huguenin
> Email: marc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Blog: https://marc.petit-huguenin.org
> Profile: https://www.linkedin.com/in/petithug
>
--
---
tte@xxxxxxxxx
