Minneapolis is a work destination, not a leisure destination, which makes it unsuitable for people who mistake the IETF for a travel agency. But +1. On 7/31/23 13:01, Andrew G. Malis wrote: > Another vote for Minneapolis! The hotel couldn't have been better suited > for us, and you can walk indoors to most of downtown to avoid bad weather. > > Cheers, > Andy > > > On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 3:41 PM Mary B <mary.h.barnes@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Minneapolis was a great venue for us. It's never been clear to me why we >> stopped going there regularly. >> >> On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 1:43 PM Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >>> On 7/31/23 14:16, Randy Presuhn wrote: >>> >>> The unavailability of good public transportation would on its own be a >>> reason to rule out any meeting venue, on cost, practical and environmental >>> factors. >>> >>> >>> You're really making the case for meeting in Minneapolis. :-) >>> >>> Minneapolis was the best overall venue we ever had. Or at least, the >>> best venue in the US. >>> >>> Keith >>> >>> >>> > -- Marc Petit-Huguenin Email: marc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Blog: https://marc.petit-huguenin.org Profile: https://www.linkedin.com/in/petithug
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
