Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/15/23 03:53, Carsten Bormann wrote:

(And, yes, I know of enough groups that try to do all their work in weekly/bi-weekly calls,

IMO, such groups should be suspended immediately.   At a minimum their chairs should be replaced and their existing output subject to community wide review before the group is allowed to continue.   That practice is exclusionary to a wide range of potential participants, and any "consensus" claimed from such a process is a poor joke.

It's not the first time that an IETF WG has tried to operate in isolation while benefiting from IETF's presumed legitimacy for themselves.  But whenever it happens it needs to be nipped in the bud.


Keith





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux