On 7/5/23 9:57 AM, Keith Moore wrote:
On 7/5/23 11:51, Michael Thomas wrote:
As I stated from the very beginning, this was a complete process
failure of the IESG. So, yes it is very pertinent to the IETF list.
I agree that the discussion up to this point was appropriate for the
IETF list. But if this discussion is going to result in anything
useful we need to get into more detail than is appropriate here. So
it's about time to move the discussion.
Would SAAG be the right venue to discuss deprecating rfc 8252? It's
certainly not the OAUTH wg itself. But I still have a lot of concern of
how two non-security AD's found the same problem as I did, yet voted "No
objection". That is a real process problem for IETF on the whole, not
just some particular area.
Mike
