On 7/5/23 11:51, Michael Thomas wrote:
As I stated from the very beginning, this was a complete process failure of the IESG. So, yes it is very pertinent to the IETF list.
I agree that the discussion up to this point was appropriate for the IETF list. But if this discussion is going to result in anything useful we need to get into more detail than is appropriate here. So it's about time to move the discussion.
Keith
