Does anyone disagree with the following? - 8713 will not be updated in time to take effect for this NomCom's selection process. - The text of 8713 specifies a process that, if followed, means a delay of at least one week, and perhaps at least two weeks. "Picking next one the list" is the process recommended by at least the last half-dozen NomCom chairs, and followed by at least one of them (me); perhaps more than one. Yes, this can be gamed. So what; security is about trade-offs and saving time is more important for now. Some folks might want to review the errata at https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/rfc8713. I have no idea where discussions of that should happen. It wasn't clear to me if Rob was proposing an interpretation of 8713, or providing input to a revision. I had to disqualify one potential volunteer. They said yes, and then I was unable to interact with them for the next three days (it was the weekend). One day is not enough. And weekends aren't the same globally, once you allow for timezones or countries that observe the classic Sabbath.
