On 4/25/2023 3:22 PM, Salz, Rich wrote: > I don't think re-randomize is what we should be doing. Just go to the next one on the initial list. On 4/25/23, 5:24 PM, "Michael StJohns" <mstjohns@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:mstjohns@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: The problem with that is gaming the system. Yes that could be a problem. The trade-off is that redoing the randomization delays the process by at least a week, more likely two.
