Having been put back in my box, Possibly, a one sentence change solves my only real concern: The document marks as historic any "int" domain names that were designated for infrastructure purposes **BY THE IETF** Noting that my whinge about "but what does define the purpose of the domain" is beyond scope, I have no other comment. (this is because "infrastructure" is a bit imprecise and could be taken to mean a lot of things. The point would be that its removing dependencies documented in RFCs, and dependencies facing RFC process) I get that for a lot of people thats implicit. I would think that being explicit only adds value. -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
