Hiya, On 10/10/2022 19:59, Richard Barnes wrote:
To the degree that's the case (which I'm not sure of), it shouldn't be read as exculpatory of the IETF list.
I agree - we shouldn't be more or less trigger happy or rude when sending to or receiving from the IETF list regardless of whether that correlation is real or not. To be clear: I wasn't proposing any particular action if the correlation I posited turned out to be real. My guess is that it'd be v. v. subtle as to how that ought affect an update to BCP 83. But I do think any update to BCP 83 really ought take into account the fact that our email lists are to some extent now a relatively minor part of a much bigger (and oftentimes engineered to be toxic) messaging and short message broadcast system. Cheers, S.
Attachment:
OpenPGP_0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
