> >might be better as: > > In no way should this experiment or any future BCP for this small > > number of cases take precendence over the IETF's normal mode of > > operation. Specifically, these procedures are only to be > > used when a working group agrees to use them. > > > Define "agrees". When a WG is blocked on consensus for a technical > issue, and someone proposes using the alternative process to reach a > decision, do you need consensus to use the alternative process? If so, > I'm skeptical that people who have been stonewalling each other on the > technical decision are going to agree to a process that means they don't > get to stonewall any more. the ID does go into a process to try to deal with this Scott _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf