On 10/3/22 21:21, John C Klensin wrote:
But, AFAICT, none of that has anything to do with BCP 83 because it, again, AFAICT, is strictly about mailing lists.
Mostly agree, but IESG did cite their censorship of Dan's drafts in support of their proposed action. By now it's pointless to relitigate that censorship as the immediate damage has already been done and is irreparable. But in the context of this PR-action it's fair, IMO, to question the propriety of IESG using their previous action to support their proposed action.
Keith -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
