> On 10/03/2022 5:27 PM EDT Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> Some people (including myself) may wish to take due
> care in formally responding, to make sure they've patiently tried to
> evaluate all of the information presented in support of the proposed action.
>
It's good to have _ALL_ the information. For example, some may be surprised to find out that this IESG action has not propery followed BCP 83. You will notice that in section 2 [1] the #2 bullet says:
2. it is published as an IESG last call on the IETF general
discussion list;
And the IETF general discussion list seen here [2] to be: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
And this action was posted on a different list making this action void. But please be on guard, it is entirey probable that Ted Hardie could make a "Tiny Update to BCP 83" to "fix" this issue.
[1] https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3683.html#section-2
[2]
https://www.ietf.org/how/lists/discussion/#:~:text=General%20IETF%20discussion%20list,no%20dedicated%20mailing%20lists%20exist.
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
