Salz, Rich <rsalz=40akamai.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
mcr> I think that this is the case where Brian emails the nomcom chair, and asks
mcr> to have do his feedback anonymously.
mcr> I was never asked not to share with liasons, but I think that had I been
mcr> given a good reason, I would have done exactly that.
> I do not want to do either of these things for several reasons.
I agree that selecting sharing is a problem.
But, pseudo-anonymous feedback has a long history.
> If this kind of thing is necessary, I think the burden has to be on the
> person who thinks they are at risk. They can find their own trusted
> third parties to forward messages, and they can decide how much
> identifying information is necessary. If the potential risk to the IETF
> is so great, they might have to disclose themselves. "Judging the
> validity of anonymous feedback" is not in RFC 8713.
That's true: the nomcom chair is not the only available filter.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
