Don't forget the cover sheet on your TPS report, and everything will be fine. On 9/9/22 23:05, Lloyd W wrote: > it's best to think of an AD, or indeed any contributor to the IETF, as an unpaid employee, with all the binding and responsibility that comes with being an employee. > > per RFC8712, IETF LLC is a subsidiary of ISOC LLC, and 360 degree reviews of employees are considered best US corporate practice, so it seems clear why the IETF has adopted them. > > Think of it as a corporate risk assessment strategy. Our people are our greatest assets, and ADs are people too. > > Assets must be controlled. > > Lloyd Wood > lloyd.wood@xxxxxxxxxxx > >> On 10 Sep 2022, at 01:38, Leif Johansson <leifj@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> I just got a bunch of these 360 reviews of various ADs in my inbox. >> >> Setting aside the question of the type of questions asked and the somewhat >> strange (at least to me) notion that ADs and other volunteers are treated >> as employees to be reviewed by other people in the community I'm very curious >> to learn where this practice was discussed. >> >> I admit not paying enoug attention to the IETF process development effort these >> days (which seems to take up as much volume as the development of standards) so >> am sure I must have missed a very interesting thread somewhere... >> >> Just point me to the relevant list archives and I'll be very happy. >> >> Cheers Leif >>
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
