Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> What I don't get from this is notice of if the work item was delivered
> or what was delivered - which is not always the same as the thing
> promised.
> We used to do WG reports in SAAG until we stopped because there were
> better things to do. But one thing that we lost from that is a wrap up
> of what was delivered/achieved. Might be useful just to do the
> recharterings and closures. Probably best to do that before they happen
> rather than waiting for them to happen since many WGs are effectively
> closed long before they are shut.
I think that one way is to have IAB or Area (SAAG) tech talks.
I pushed for this to happen for DOTS, for instance.
That winds up on youtube, and actually provides a good deal of useful content
for those who were not at the IETF at the time. I wish we had such stuff
from the 1990s...
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
