Re: Want to be on the IESG?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Toerless Eckert <tte@xxxxxxxxx>, Lloyd W <lloyd.wood@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Want to be on the IESG?
From: Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 22:03:16 -0400
Cc: ietf@xxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <YWTseV3lWpO43YND@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <YV9bZu1Zo7wlmkij@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <FF533C97-415F-4F8A-A6C3-30A3E28C5735@yahoo.co.uk> <YWTseV3lWpO43YND@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0

On 10/11/21 10:01 PM, Toerless Eckert wrote:

That small echo chamber consensus model is IMHO insufficient for the type
of GEN work that really needs the larger community, non-expert consensus.

+1

References:
- Re: Want to be on the IESG?
  - From: Toerless Eckert
- Re: Want to be on the IESG?
  - From: Lloyd W
- Re: Want to be on the IESG?
  - From: Toerless Eckert

Prev by Date: Re: Want to be on the IESG?
Next by Date: Re: [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-bis-15
Previous by thread: Re: Want to be on the IESG?
Next by thread: Re: Want to be on the IESG?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Mhonarc] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux