Re: Want to be on the IESG?

[Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 04/10/2021 21:18, Salz, Rich wrote:
> > Making the AD job smaller has been mentioned,
>
> Effort was expended in that direction while I was on the IESG but
> that effort failed (sadly).
>
> It would be good for the IETF community to understand those efforts
> and various people's impressions of why things failed.
>
> > but there are other ways, including adding more Area Directors,
> > splitting the Areas up smaller, stopping the semi-automatic renewal
> > of an AD for a second term
>
> > I'd be very skeptical that any of the above would turn
> out well.
>
> On the one hand, I want to know why you think that. On the other
> hand, since you didn't bother to give reasons I'm not sure why I
> should care, either.

Understood. I'd be happy to expound over a beer but it'd all
take too long to type tbh, and would likely be controversial
or be text with which it'd be very easy to disagree, so it's
maybe one that'd have to wait 'till we manage to meet again.

Cheers,
S.


>

Attachment: OpenPGP_0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature