Hiya, On 29/09/2021 13:11, Lars Eggert wrote:
So maybe we could try the opposite, and see if the community has some consensus on what information they would like to retain on ietf-announce, under the assumption that that would then remain our lists for broad announcements.
I don't consider the suggested new list worth the effort. Nor would it be terrible. I somewhat agree with those who worry about this pattern: "subset of people have problem with list traffic => correct answer is make new list and split traffic between new and old lists." A bit of de-duping and reducing the frequency of announcing the now much more common interim meetings would be good. (A weekly summary message of all scheduled interims could be an option.) Cheers, S.
Attachment:
OpenPGP_0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
