Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 13 Apr 2021, at 11:56, Eliot Lear wrote:

> The opendnssec team did a phenomenal job, only to be thwarted by secondary servers and amplification attack concerns.

One more thing....the OpenDNSSEC design did not really take key rollover and the need for interaction and/or integration in the registrar/registry (epp) flow of data. So actual deployment in operational environments was not trivial.

Today, with better support for management of DS inbound in a signed zone, this is not as big as a problem as it was. Specifically as the need for rolling KSK is also questioned. As long as you CAN roll the KSK.

   Patrik

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux